” Whose ” USEING IN INANIMATE NOUN
Using of ” whose ” with an Inanimate Noun and Animate Noun
Using of Whose in Inanimate noun: ” Which ” and ” Who ” is the possessive form of ” Whose ” and just ” who ” is not always a possessive form of it. it means that inanimate objects and animate objects can use with them. You will understand better by examples.
Read more about Nouns:
Here, ( ” Whose ‘ is use with Inanimate objects and Animate objects )
- Sweetheart is like a beautiful flower that I cannot touch, but whose makes the garden a area of pleasure.
Here, ( ” flower ” is an animate noun and ” whose ” is use with them ).
- There is no energy more strong than the idea that whose time has come.
Here, ( ” the idea” is an inanimate noun and ” whose ” is use with them ).
- What is a clothe? A plant whose worths have not been found.
Here, ( ” a plant ” is an animate noun and ” whose ” is use with them ).
- I have not started a poetry yet whose knows the end. Composing poetry is a finding.
Here, ( ” a poetry ” is an animate noun and ” whose ” is use with them ).
Why do many peoples hate using ” whose ” for inanimate objects?
So, an inanimate object ” whose ” could be used with them. it judges awkward because we manage to consider ” whose ” as being the possessive form used with “who” and not ” with which.”
Different between ” Which ” and ” Who ”
” Who ” is a relative pronoun which is used to refer to a person and animals. Who is known as antecedent refers to the persons and animals?
( bold words are antecedent in these sentences )
- I don’t know the girl who robbed the gift.
Here, ( In this sentence, ” girl ” is antecedent of ” who ” ).
- My friend is a superman with the magic stick who is holding now.
Here, ( In this sentence, ” superman ” is antecedent of ” who ” ).
In the second above sentence of the example, we understand ” who is holding now “it’s indicating to superman because ” who ” is indicating the animate noun because superman is a living organism.
Here, ( In this sentence, ” stick ” is antecedent of the word ” which ” and stick is an inanimate noun because it is the non-living thing.
In the above example of the sentence, we understand ” which is holding now “it is indicating the ” stick ” because it is referring to the ” superman “. We would use ” who ” with it and not which “.
The main difference between ” which ” and ” who “is why authors are unwilling to use antecedent with an inanimate noun “whose ” regardless if you think of ” whose ” as possessive of the both ” which and who ” ( not use just who ) then these hesitations are vanishes.
Use Antecedent ” whose ” with an inanimate noun
Now, ” whose ” if you can not use inanimate objects with it, then it is possible to use the inanimate object by the following structure.
[ Noun ] + [ of preposition ] + [ which ]
- Sweetheart is like a beautiful flower that I cannot touch, but the small of which makes the garden a area of pleasure.
- I have not started a poetry yet the end of which knows . Composing poetry is a finding.
As we remember animate antecedents when we experience ” who ” multiple individuals persons assume the relative pronoun ” whose ” must also recognise to an animate antecedent. Regardless, it is not the issue. ” Whose ” can also be abused for inanimate antecedents. ( After all, the word “which’s” never live.)
Does ” whose ” is indicating to Inanimate objects
There is never any conflict about utilising ” whose ” to indicate to persons or animals. Yet, some discussion about whether good to operate whose is a guide to something which is not a person or animal, a bus or a flower, for example. ” what Ali was ask about ” whether it is good to operate whose is a guide to what’s called as an “inanimate antecedent.” bus and flowers are not active in the duplicate logic as peoples and animals. Of course, flowers are living plants, but plants are consider inanimate because after cutting trees or flowers are dead. I imagine flowers and trees can not speak or intercommunication in an animated tone.
In brief, Aliis absolutely right when he uses whose to indicate to the flower. Although many peoples are not like them ” whose ” is the superior English language word we have to indicate to the inanimate antecedents. Possibly somebody will develop a fresh word for this pursuit, but as of nowadays, we are hanging with whose. Moving back to the 14th century, you will discover numerous academic instances of writers guiding around to an inanimate antecedent.